To explain this problem further, consider an exploding star (supernova) at, say, an accurately measured 100,000 light-years away remember we are using this explanation in a 10,000-year-old universe. Why do people believe in evolution one of the most mind-numbing mysteries for those who do not believe in evolution is trying to understand the people who do [perhaps evolutionists feel the same exasperation in regard to creationists' beliefs, but on that point i am less qualified to judge. There is disagreement on some of the details of the theory - the details of the how and why - but not the big questions that things evolve or even the general ideas of how and why this issue was taken up in the july, 2002 issue of scientific american. Strictly defined, creationism is based on a literal reading of the bible's book of genesis, which describes the creation of the world and all the life in it over a period of six days.
Objects & organisisms in the world are too complex to have been created simply by the big bang needs a designer- paley's watch analogy conditions for humans to survive on earth are so perfect so the creation of the universe needed divine intervention. Creationism is commonly recognised as a religion that does not regard the big bang theory or evolution to be true creationists are a group of, often evangelical christians, who have a literal belief in the creation stories of the bible it teaches that everything in the universes ultimate cause is god. Even when bolstered by modern genetics, evolutionary theory does not explain why life emerged on earth more than 3 billion years ago, or whether life was highly probable, even inevitable, or a.
Some do criticize and reject darwinian evolution, but then will still allow some other form of evolution--creative evolution, pantheistic evolution, punctuational evolution, or something some still resort to the unscientific gap theory which seeks to insert the ages between the first two verses of genesis. The only science that creationists do not use is the speculative science of evolution that has nothing to do with useful operational science evolutionary ideas like monkey-to-man charts that supposedly chart human evolution are based on pure speculation and not useful to science and technology in any way. I do not know if creation & the flood as recorded in the bible are true but i do know that there is some very good evidence to support this scientific theory most other sites which deal with our ancient origins claim to have the final word.
If you were just casually driving on a random side road in petersburg, ky, you might think that creation museum was a museum about dinosaurs creationists believe most dinosaurs died during the. Perhaps someday we will try to explain why the theory of evolution violates the second law of thermodynamics meanwhile, the best we can do is recommend you read the essays in in six days written by the seven scientists mentioned above. Creationism is the religious belief that the universe and life originated from specific acts of divine creation, as opposed to the scientific conclusion that they came about through natural processes.
We do not know how the creator created, what processes he used, for he used processes which are not now operating anywhere in the natural universe this is why we refer to creation as special creation we cannot discover by scientific investigations anything about the creative processes used by the. Answer: it is not the purpose of this answer to present a scientific argument in the creation vs evolution debate the purpose of this article is to explain why, according to the bible, the creation vs evolution debate even exists in its present form. It says what happens, but not why it does not explain what gravity is or how it works a theory of gravity, such as albert einstein's theory of general relativity, explains why this happens. Fundamentalists often make it a test of christian orthodoxy to believe that the world was created in six 24-hour days and that no other interpretations of genesis 1 are possible.
The guardian - back to home and some are anti-creationists keen to keep tabs on the enemy could provide the opportunity to explain or explore why they are not considered to be scientific. Maybe the only reason that anyone would laugh at creationists is because they themselves have not been honest enough and forthright enough to have done some simple homework and gone to some reputable sight like wikipedia and done a search for atomic orbatals or atoms and reveiwed the info there so that they may possibly (and i do qualify. Creationists commonly argue against evolution on the grounds that evolution is a religion it is not a science, in order to undermine the higher ground biologists claim in debating creationists, and to reframe the debate from being between science (evolution) and religion (creationism) to being between two equally religious beliefs—or even. Not only does evolution not begin to explain the universe but it makes no attempts to do so evolution has nothing to do with the formation of the universe, the origin of the planets or how life began.